fkie_cve-2025-54939
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-08-01 06:15
Modified
2025-08-20 20:15
Severity ?
Summary
LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.3.1 has an lsquic_engine_packet_in memory leak.
References
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version |
---|
{ "cveTags": [], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) Library before 4.3.1 has an lsquic_engine_packet_in memory leak." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "La librer\u00eda LiteSpeed QUIC (LSQUIC) anterior a 4.3.1 tiene una p\u00e9rdida de memoria lsquic_engine_packet_in." } ], "id": "CVE-2025-54939", "lastModified": "2025-08-20T20:15:32.880", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "LOW", "baseScore": 5.3, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 1.4, "source": "cve@mitre.org", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2025-08-01T06:15:28.860", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://blog.litespeedtech.com/2025/08/18/litespeed-security-update/" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/lsquic/blob/70486141724f85e97b08f510673e29f399bbae8f/CHANGELOG#L1-L3" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://github.com/litespeedtech/lsquic/commit/4cd9252e77fb4a36b572e2167a84067d603d3b23" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "url": "https://www.imperva.com/blog/quic-leak-cve-2025-54939-new-high-risk-pre-handshake-remote-denial-of-service-in-lsquic-quic-implementation/" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-770" } ], "source": "cve@mitre.org", "type": "Secondary" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…