fkie_cve-2025-7784
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2025-07-18 14:15
Modified
2025-08-11 19:16
Summary
A flaw was found in the Keycloak identity and access management system when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions(FGAPv2) are enabled. An administrative user with the manage-users role can escalate their privileges to realm-admin due to improper privilege enforcement. This vulnerability allows unauthorized elevation of access rights, compromising the intended separation of administrative duties and posing a security risk to the realm.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
redhat build_of_keycloak -



{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_keycloak:-:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E5C930CB-4EAD-497B-A44B-D880F2A1F85B",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A flaw was found in the Keycloak identity and access management system when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions(FGAPv2) are enabled. An administrative user with the manage-users role can escalate their privileges to realm-admin due to improper privilege enforcement. This vulnerability allows unauthorized elevation of access rights, compromising the intended separation of administrative duties and posing a security risk to the realm."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Se detect\u00f3 una falla en Keycloak identity and access management system cuando los permisos Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) estaban habilitados. Un usuario administrativo con el rol \"administrar usuarios\" puede escalar sus privilegios a \"administrador de dominio\" debido a una aplicaci\u00f3n incorrecta de privilegios. Esta vulnerabilidad permite la elevaci\u00f3n no autorizada de derechos de acceso, lo que compromete la separaci\u00f3n prevista de las funciones administrativas y supone un riesgo de seguridad para el dominio."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-7784",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-11T19:16:40.103",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
        "impactScore": 5.2,
        "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-18T14:15:26.983",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12015"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:12016"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-7784"
    },
    {
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking"
      ],
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2381861"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-269"
        }
      ],
      "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…