ghsa-27fw-6hp8-fgww
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:27
Modified
2022-05-17 00:27
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The av_color_primaries_name function in libavutil/pixdesc.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3 may return a NULL pointer depending on a value contained in a file, but callers do not anticipate this, as demonstrated by the avcodec_string function in libavcodec/utils.c, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. (It is also conceivable that there is security relevance for a NULL pointer dereference in av_color_primaries_name calls within the ffprobe command-line program.)
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-14225" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-09-09T08:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The av_color_primaries_name function in libavutil/pixdesc.c in FFmpeg 3.3.3 may return a NULL pointer depending on a value contained in a file, but callers do not anticipate this, as demonstrated by the avcodec_string function in libavcodec/utils.c, leading to a NULL pointer dereference. (It is also conceivable that there is security relevance for a NULL pointer dereference in av_color_primaries_name calls within the ffprobe command-line program.)", "id": "GHSA-27fw-6hp8-fgww", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:27:12Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:27:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14225" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/commit/837cb4325b712ff1aab531bf41668933f61d75d2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-August/215198.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100704" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…