ghsa-2988-2x63-c565
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 06:51
Modified
2022-05-01 06:51
Details

** DISPUTED ** Microsoft ISA Server 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass certain filtering rules, including ones for (1) ICMP and (2) TCP, via IPv6 packets. NOTE: An established researcher has disputed this issue, saying that "Neither ISA Server 2004 nor Windows 2003 Basic Firewall support IPv6 filtering ... This is different network protocol."

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-1651"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-04-06T10:04:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED **  Microsoft ISA Server 2004 allows remote attackers to bypass certain filtering rules, including ones for (1) ICMP and (2) TCP, via IPv6 packets.  NOTE: An established researcher has disputed this issue, saying that \"Neither ISA Server 2004 nor Windows 2003 Basic Firewall support IPv6 filtering ... This is different network protocol.\"",
  "id": "GHSA-2988-2x63-c565",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T06:51:35Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:51:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-1651"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429816/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/429846/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430281/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/430684/100/0/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…