ghsa-2ff5-43qf-52rc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-10 00:00
Modified
2022-05-18 00:00
Details

There is a vulnerability in htmldoc 1.9.16. In image_load_jpeg function image.cxx when it calls malloc,'img->width' and 'img->height' they are large enough to cause an integer overflow. So, the malloc function may return a heap blosmaller than the expected size, and it will cause a buffer overflow/Address boundary error in the jpeg_read_scanlines function.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-27114"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-05-09T17:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "There is a vulnerability in htmldoc 1.9.16. In image_load_jpeg function image.cxx when it calls malloc,\u0027img-\u003ewidth\u0027 and \u0027img-\u003eheight\u0027 they are large enough to cause an integer overflow. So, the malloc function may return a heap blosmaller than the expected size, and it will cause a buffer overflow/Address boundary error in the jpeg_read_scanlines function.",
  "id": "GHSA-2ff5-43qf-52rc",
  "modified": "2022-05-18T00:00:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-10T00:00:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-27114"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/michaelrsweet/htmldoc/issues/471"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/michaelrsweet/htmldoc/commit/31f780487e5ddc426888638786cdc47631687275"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00014.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…