ghsa-2v69-c83c-r4mh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:02
Modified
2022-05-17 02:02
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-0427" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-01-19T12:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in Tor before 0.2.1.29 and 0.2.2.x before 0.2.2.21-alpha allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.", "id": "GHSA-2v69-c83c-r4mh", "modified": "2022-05-17T02:02:23Z", "published": "2022-05-17T02:02:23Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-0427" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64748" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/blob/refs/heads/release-0.2.2:/ChangeLog" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Jan-2011/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-02129-released-security-patches" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42905" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/42907" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2148" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45832" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024980" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0131" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0132" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…