ghsa-2xh3-9jm8-r4r2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-10 18:30
Modified
2025-02-21 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: sched: fix ets qdisc OOB Indexing

Haowei Yan g1042620637@gmail.com found that ets_class_from_arg() can index an Out-Of-Bound class in ets_class_from_arg() when passed clid of 0. The overflow may cause local privilege escalation.

[ 18.852298] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 18.853271] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/sched/sch_ets.c:93:20 [ 18.853743] index 18446744073709551615 is out of range for type 'ets_class [16]' [ 18.854254] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1275 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.12.6-dirty #17 [ 18.854821] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 18.856532] Call Trace: [ 18.857441] [ 18.858227] dump_stack_lvl+0xc2/0xf0 [ 18.859607] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 18.860908] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0 [ 18.864022] ets_class_change+0x3d6/0x3f0 [ 18.864322] tc_ctl_tclass+0x251/0x910 [ 18.864587] ? lock_acquire+0x5e/0x140 [ 18.865113] ? __mutex_lock+0x9c/0xe70 [ 18.866009] ? __mutex_lock+0xa34/0xe70 [ 18.866401] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x170/0x6f0 [ 18.866806] ? __lock_acquire+0x578/0xc10 [ 18.867184] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [ 18.867503] netlink_rcv_skb+0x59/0x110 [ 18.867776] rtnetlink_rcv+0x15/0x30 [ 18.868159] netlink_unicast+0x1c3/0x2b0 [ 18.868440] netlink_sendmsg+0x239/0x4b0 [ 18.868721] _syssendmsg+0x3e2/0x410 [ 18.869012] _sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xe0 [ 18.869276] ? rseq_ip_fixup+0x198/0x260 [ 18.869563] ? rseq_update_cpu_node_id+0x10a/0x190 [ 18.869900] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x5a/0xd0 [ 18.870196] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x220 [ 18.870547] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x150 [ 18.870821] ? __memcg_slab_free_hook+0x69/0x290 [ 18.871157] __sys_sendmsg+0x69/0xd0 [ 18.871416] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1d/0x30 [ 18.871699] x64_sys_call+0x9e2/0x2670 [ 18.871979] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 18.873280] ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x150 [ 18.874742] ? lock_release+0x7b/0x160 [ 18.876157] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x5ce/0x8f0 [ 18.877833] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0xc2/0x210 [ 18.879608] ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0 [ 18.879808] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 18.880023] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 18.880223] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70 [ 18.880426] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 18.880683] RIP: 0033:0x44a957 [ 18.880851] Code: ff ff e8 fc 00 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 8974 24 10 [ 18.881766] RSP: 002b:00007ffcdd00fad8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e [ 18.882149] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcdd010db8 RCX: 000000000044a957 [ 18.882507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffcdd00fb70 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 18.885037] RBP: 00007ffcdd010bc0 R08: 000000000703c770 R09: 000000000703c7c0 [ 18.887203] R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 18.888026] R13: 00007ffcdd010da8 R14: 00000000004ca7d0 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 18.888395] [ 18.888610] ---[ end trace ]---

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21692"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-129"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-10T16:15:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: sched: fix ets qdisc OOB Indexing\n\nHaowei Yan \u003cg1042620637@gmail.com\u003e found that ets_class_from_arg() can\nindex an Out-Of-Bound class in ets_class_from_arg() when passed clid of\n0. The overflow may cause local privilege escalation.\n\n [   18.852298] ------------[ cut here ]------------\n [   18.853271] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/sched/sch_ets.c:93:20\n [   18.853743] index 18446744073709551615 is out of range for type \u0027ets_class [16]\u0027\n [   18.854254] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1275 Comm: poc Not tainted 6.12.6-dirty #17\n [   18.854821] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014\n [   18.856532] Call Trace:\n [   18.857441]  \u003cTASK\u003e\n [   18.858227]  dump_stack_lvl+0xc2/0xf0\n [   18.859607]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20\n [   18.860908]  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xa7/0xf0\n [   18.864022]  ets_class_change+0x3d6/0x3f0\n [   18.864322]  tc_ctl_tclass+0x251/0x910\n [   18.864587]  ? lock_acquire+0x5e/0x140\n [   18.865113]  ? __mutex_lock+0x9c/0xe70\n [   18.866009]  ? __mutex_lock+0xa34/0xe70\n [   18.866401]  rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x170/0x6f0\n [   18.866806]  ? __lock_acquire+0x578/0xc10\n [   18.867184]  ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10\n [   18.867503]  netlink_rcv_skb+0x59/0x110\n [   18.867776]  rtnetlink_rcv+0x15/0x30\n [   18.868159]  netlink_unicast+0x1c3/0x2b0\n [   18.868440]  netlink_sendmsg+0x239/0x4b0\n [   18.868721]  ____sys_sendmsg+0x3e2/0x410\n [   18.869012]  ___sys_sendmsg+0x88/0xe0\n [   18.869276]  ? rseq_ip_fixup+0x198/0x260\n [   18.869563]  ? rseq_update_cpu_node_id+0x10a/0x190\n [   18.869900]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x5a/0xd0\n [   18.870196]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcc/0x220\n [   18.870547]  ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x150\n [   18.870821]  ? __memcg_slab_free_hook+0x69/0x290\n [   18.871157]  __sys_sendmsg+0x69/0xd0\n [   18.871416]  __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1d/0x30\n [   18.871699]  x64_sys_call+0x9e2/0x2670\n [   18.871979]  do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150\n [   18.873280]  ? do_syscall_64+0x93/0x150\n [   18.874742]  ? lock_release+0x7b/0x160\n [   18.876157]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x5ce/0x8f0\n [   18.877833]  ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0xc2/0x210\n [   18.879608]  ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0\n [   18.879808]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70\n [   18.880023]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70\n [   18.880223]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x15/0x70\n [   18.880426]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n [   18.880683] RIP: 0033:0x44a957\n [   18.880851] Code: ff ff e8 fc 00 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 8974 24 10\n [   18.881766] RSP: 002b:00007ffcdd00fad8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e\n [   18.882149] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcdd010db8 RCX: 000000000044a957\n [   18.882507] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffcdd00fb70 RDI: 0000000000000003\n [   18.885037] RBP: 00007ffcdd010bc0 R08: 000000000703c770 R09: 000000000703c7c0\n [   18.887203] R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001\n [   18.888026] R13: 00007ffcdd010da8 R14: 00000000004ca7d0 R15: 0000000000000001\n [   18.888395]  \u003c/TASK\u003e\n [   18.888610] ---[ end trace ]---",
  "id": "GHSA-2xh3-9jm8-r4r2",
  "modified": "2025-02-21T18:31:08Z",
  "published": "2025-02-10T18:30:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21692"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03c56665dab1f4ac844bc156652d50d639093fa5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1332c6ed446be787f901ed1064ec6a3c694f028a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/997f6ec4208b23c87daf9f044689685f091826f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bcf0d815e728a3a304b50455b32a3170c16e1eaa"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d62b04fca4340a0d468d7853bd66e511935a18cb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4168299e553f17aa2ba4016e77a9c38da40eb1d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6b0f05fbfa4044f890e8a348288c0d9a20bd1d0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…