ghsa-3574-q5g6-f77j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-09 12:31
Modified
2025-07-09 12:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

lib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly()

While testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 > poll_queues will trigger following panic:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70 Call Trace: __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0 group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490 blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110 null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk] blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160 blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560 nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk] nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk] configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0 vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0 ksys_write+0x79/0x180 __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Root cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from kcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced.

Fix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and return NULL directly if numgrps is zero.

[yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38255"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-09T11:15:27Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlib/group_cpus: fix NULL pointer dereference from group_cpus_evenly()\n\nWhile testing null_blk with configfs, echo 0 \u003e poll_queues will trigger\nfollowing panic:\n\nBUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000010\nOops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI\nCPU: 27 UID: 0 PID: 920 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.15.0-02023-gadbdb95c8696-dirty #1238 PREEMPT(undef)\nHardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014\nRIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x48/0x70\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n __group_cpus_evenly+0x822/0x8c0\n group_cpus_evenly+0x2d9/0x490\n blk_mq_map_queues+0x1e/0x110\n null_map_queues+0xc9/0x170 [null_blk]\n blk_mq_update_queue_map+0xdb/0x160\n blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x22b/0x560\n nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk]\n nullb_device_poll_queues_store+0xa4/0x130 [null_blk]\n configfs_write_iter+0x109/0x1d0\n vfs_write+0x26e/0x6f0\n ksys_write+0x79/0x180\n __x64_sys_write+0x1d/0x30\n x64_sys_call+0x45c4/0x45f0\n do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x240\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e\n\nRoot cause is that numgrps is set to 0, and ZERO_SIZE_PTR is returned from\nkcalloc(), and later ZERO_SIZE_PTR will be deferenced.\n\nFix the problem by checking numgrps first in group_cpus_evenly(), and\nreturn NULL directly if numgrps is zero.\n\n[yukuai3@huawei.com: also fix the non-SMP version]",
  "id": "GHSA-3574-q5g6-f77j",
  "modified": "2025-07-09T12:31:35Z",
  "published": "2025-07-09T12:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38255"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29d39e0d5f16c060e32542b2cf351c09fd22b250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64a99eff8dcf1f951a544e6058341b2b19a8fdbd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/911ef2e8a7de5b2bae8ff11fb0bd01f699e6db65"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df831e97739405ecbaddb85516bc7d4d1c933d6b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…