ghsa-363h-vj6q-3cmj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2020-08-31 22:45
Modified
2021-09-23 19:28
Summary
Rosetta-Flash JSONP Vulnerability in hapi
Details

This description taken from the pull request provided by Patrick Kettner.

Versions 6.1.0 and earlier of hapi are vulnerable to a rosetta-flash attack, which can be used by attackers to send data across domains and break the browser same-origin-policy.

Recommendation

  • Update hapi to version 6.1.1 or later.

Alternatively, a solution previously implemented by Google, Facebook, and Github is to prepend callbacks with an empty inline comment. This will cause the flash parser to break on invalid inputs and prevent the issue, and how the issue has been resolved internally in hapi.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "hapi"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "6.1.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-4671"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-08-31T18:07:45Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "This description taken from the pull request provided by Patrick Kettner.\n\n\n\nVersions 6.1.0 and earlier of hapi are vulnerable to a rosetta-flash attack, which can be used by attackers to send data across domains and break the browser same-origin-policy.\n\n\n\n\n\n## Recommendation\n\n- Update hapi to version 6.1.1 or later.\n\nAlternatively, a solution previously implemented by Google, Facebook, and Github is to prepend callbacks with an empty inline comment. This will cause the flash parser to break on invalid inputs and prevent the issue, and how the issue has been resolved internally in hapi.",
  "id": "GHSA-363h-vj6q-3cmj",
  "modified": "2021-09-23T19:28:27Z",
  "published": "2020-08-31T22:45:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-4671"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spumko/hapi/pull/1766"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/hapijs/hapi/commit/d47f57abf23bdaa84f61aed2bac94ae5f358afb7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patrickkettner"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/spumko/hapi"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-17.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://miki.it/blog/2014/7/8/abusing-jsonp-with-rosetta-flash"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0860.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59774"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/59837"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201407-02.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/68457"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030533"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Rosetta-Flash JSONP Vulnerability in hapi"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.