ghsa-3jm4-c6qf-jrh3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-24 17:58
Modified
2024-12-04 22:18
Summary
OpenRefine's PreviewExpressionCommand, which is eval, lacks protection against cross-site request forgery (CSRF)
Details

Summary

Lack of CSRF protection on the preview-expression command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code.

The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row.

Details

The com.google.refine.commands.expr.PreviewExpressionCommand class contains the following comment: /** * The command uses POST but does not actually modify any state so it does not require CSRF. */

However, this appears to be false (or no longer true). The expression being previewed (executed) can be written in GREL, Python, or Clojure. Since there are no restrictions on what code can be executed, the expression can do anything the user running OpenRefine can do. For instance, the following expressions start a calculator:

clojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) "gnome-calculator")

jython:import os;os.system("gnome-calculator")

The lack of restrictions on expressions is arguably not a problem if the user is typing their own expressions into OpenRefine: they could have just as well typed them into Clojure or Python directly. However, since the preview-expression command does not check for a CSRF token, the expression can actually come from a HTML form submitted by a different origin, including arbitrary websites.

Issue #2164 suggested adding CSRF protection to all endpoints, but this endpoint was skipped (and the above comment added) in the associated PR #2182.

PoC

An example "malicious" page is at https://wandernauta.nl/or/ (of course, actual malicious pages would not wait for the victim to press the submit button).

The following curl command (substituting the project ID) also demonstrates the issue:

sh curl -d project=123456789 -d cellIndex=1 -d rowIndices='[0]' -d 'expression=clojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) "gnome-calculator")' http://localhost:3333/command/core/preview-expression/

Impact

CSRF into remote code execution, provided the attacker knows at least one project ID in the victim's workspace and can convince the victim to open a malicious webpage.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.openrefine:main"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.8.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-47879"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352",
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-10-24T17:58:53Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-24T21:15:12Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nLack of CSRF protection on the `preview-expression` command means that visiting a malicious website could cause an attacker-controlled expression to be executed. The expression can contain arbitrary Clojure or Python code.\n\nThe attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row.\n\n### Details\n\nThe `com.google.refine.commands.expr.PreviewExpressionCommand` class contains the following comment:\n```\n/**\n * The command uses POST but does not actually modify any state so it does not require CSRF.\n */\n```\n\nHowever, this appears to be false (or no longer true). The expression being previewed (executed) can be written in GREL, Python, or Clojure. Since there are no restrictions on what code can be executed, the expression can do anything the user running OpenRefine can do. For instance, the following expressions start a calculator:\n\n```\nclojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) \"gnome-calculator\")\n```\n\n```\njython:import os;os.system(\"gnome-calculator\")\n```\n\nThe lack of restrictions on expressions is arguably not a problem if the user is typing their own expressions into OpenRefine: they could have just as well typed them into Clojure or Python directly. However, since the `preview-expression` command does not check for a CSRF token, the expression can actually come from a HTML form submitted by a different origin, including arbitrary websites.\n\nIssue #2164 suggested adding CSRF protection to all endpoints, but this endpoint was skipped (and the above comment added) in the associated PR #2182.\n\n### PoC\n\nAn example \"malicious\" page is at https://wandernauta.nl/or/ (of course, actual malicious pages would not wait for the victim to press the submit button).\n\nThe following curl command (substituting the project ID) also demonstrates the issue:\n\n```sh\ncurl -d project=123456789 -d cellIndex=1 -d rowIndices=\u0027[0]\u0027 -d \u0027expression=clojure:(.exec (Runtime/getRuntime) \"gnome-calculator\")\u0027 http://localhost:3333/command/core/preview-expression/\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nCSRF into remote code execution, provided the attacker knows at least one project ID in the victim\u0027s workspace and can convince the victim to open a malicious webpage.",
  "id": "GHSA-3jm4-c6qf-jrh3",
  "modified": "2024-12-04T22:18:02Z",
  "published": "2024-10-24T17:58:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/security/advisories/GHSA-3jm4-c6qf-jrh3"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47879"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/commit/090924ca923489b6c94397cf1f5df7f7f78f0126"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenRefine\u0027s PreviewExpressionCommand, which is eval, lacks protection against cross-site request forgery (CSRF)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…