ghsa-3qpc-4533-p5rr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:41
Modified
2022-05-14 01:41
Details

In verify_signed_hash() in lib/liboswkeys/signatures.c in Openswan before 2.6.50.1, the RSA implementation does not verify the value of padding string during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used. IKEv2 signature verification is affected when RAW RSA keys are used.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-15836"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-09-26T21:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In verify_signed_hash() in lib/liboswkeys/signatures.c in Openswan before 2.6.50.1, the RSA implementation does not verify the value of padding string during PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used. IKEv2 signature verification is affected when RAW RSA keys are used.",
  "id": "GHSA-3qpc-4533-p5rr",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T01:41:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T01:41:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-15836"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/xelerance/Openswan/commit/0b460be9e287fd335c8ce58129c67bf06065ef51"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/xelerance/Openswan/commit/9eaa6c2a823c1d2b58913506a15f9474bf857a3d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2018-August/023761.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…