ghsa-3wv8-c9pw-2c36
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:40
Modified
2022-05-02 03:40
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the tftp_request function in tftp.c in dnsmasq before 2.50, when --enable-tftp is used, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a TFTP packet, as demonstrated by a read (aka RRQ) request.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2009-2957" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2009-09-02T15:30:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the tftp_request function in tftp.c in dnsmasq before 2.50, when --enable-tftp is used, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long filename in a TFTP packet, as demonstrated by a read (aka RRQ) request.", "id": "GHSA-3wv8-c9pw-2c36", "modified": "2022-05-02T03:40:27Z", "published": "2022-05-02T03:40:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2957" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519020" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10538" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0095.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36563" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.coresecurity.com/content/dnsmasq-vulnerabilities" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36121" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/CHANGELOG" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-827-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…