ghsa-422c-878v-38j5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:09
Modified
2022-05-01 18:09
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflow in the file parsing engine in Avira Antivir Antivirus before 7.03.00.09 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted LZH archive file, resulting from an "integer cast around."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-2974" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-06-01T01:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the file parsing engine in Avira Antivir Antivirus before 7.03.00.09 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted LZH archive file, resulting from an \"integer cast around.\"", "id": "GHSA-422c-878v-38j5", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:09:12Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:09:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-2974" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34551" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://forum.antivir-pe.de/thread.php?threadid=22528" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-May/063624.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/36712" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/25417" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2764" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1018131" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.nruns.com/advisories/%5Bn.runs-SA-2007.010%5D%20-%20Avira%20Antivir%20Antivirus%20LZH%20parsing%20Arbitrary%20Code%20Execution%20Advisory.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/469805/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24187" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1971" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…