ghsa-45w8-hp4w-6fr6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Integer underflow in the base64-decoding implementation in EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition (Crypto-C ME) before 4.0.4 and 4.1, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption or segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted base64 data, a similar issue to CVE-2015-0292.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-0537" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-191" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-08-20T10:59:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Integer underflow in the base64-decoding implementation in EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite (MES) 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.3, RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition (Crypto-C ME) before 4.0.4 and 4.1, and RSA BSAFE SSL-C 2.8.9 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption or segmentation fault) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted base64 data, a similar issue to CVE-2015-0292.", "id": "GHSA-45w8-hp4w-6fr6", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:38Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0537" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2015/Aug/84" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76377" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033299" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…