ghsa-477x-w7m6-c6ph
Vulnerability from github
Published
2020-02-04 22:37
Modified
2021-08-19 16:52
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
Improper input validation in Apache Olingo
Details
The AsyncResponseWrapperImpl class in Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.6.0 reads the Retry-After header and passes it to the Thread.sleep() method without any check. If a malicious server returns a huge value in the header, then it can help to implement a DoS attack.
{ "affected": [ { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.6.0" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "Maven", "name": "org.apache.olingo:odata-client-core" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "4.0.0" }, { "fixed": "4.7.0" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2019-17555" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-02-04T22:19:48Z", "nvd_published_at": null, "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The AsyncResponseWrapperImpl class in Apache Olingo versions 4.0.0 to 4.6.0 reads the Retry-After header and passes it to the Thread.sleep() method without any check. If a malicious server returns a huge value in the header, then it can help to implement a DoS attack.", "id": "GHSA-477x-w7m6-c6ph", "modified": "2021-08-19T16:52:56Z", "published": "2020-02-04T22:37:15Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17555" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/apache/olingo-odata4/pull/61" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OLINGO-1411" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/olingo-user/201912.mbox/%3CCAGSZ4d65UmudJ_MQkFXEv9YY_wwZbRA3sgtNDzMoLM51Qh%3DRCA%40mail.gmail.com%3E" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Improper input validation in Apache Olingo" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…