ghsa-48vv-2pmq-9fvv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2018-07-23 19:51
Modified
2024-10-09 21:08
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
8.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Plone and Zope2 do not reseed pseudo-random number generator
Details

Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2).

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Zope2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.13.19"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Plone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "3.2.2"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.2.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.3a2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "Plone"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.3a1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.3b1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-6661"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-336"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T20:57:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors.  NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2).",
  "id": "GHSA-48vv-2pmq-9fvv",
  "modified": "2024-10-09T21:08:59Z",
  "published": "2018-07-23T19:51:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6661"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/1071067"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-48vv-2pmq-9fvv"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/blob/4.2.3/docs/CHANGES.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/plone/PYSEC-2014-51.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/zope2/PYSEC-2014-76.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plone.org/products/plone-hotfix/releases/20121124"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plone.org/products/plone/security/advisories/20121106/24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/11/10/1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Plone and Zope2 do not reseed pseudo-random number generator"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.