ghsa-495q-r22g-59m9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-25 15:30
Modified
2025-07-25 15:30
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
misc: tps6594-pfsm: Add NULL pointer check in tps6594_pfsm_probe()
The returned value, pfsm->miscdev.name, from devm_kasprintf() could be NULL. A pointer check is added to prevent potential NULL pointer dereference. This is similar to the fix in commit 3027e7b15b02 ("ice: Fix some null pointer dereference issues in ice_ptp.c").
This issue is found by our static analysis tool.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38368" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-25T13:15:25Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmisc: tps6594-pfsm: Add NULL pointer check in tps6594_pfsm_probe()\n\nThe returned value, pfsm-\u003emiscdev.name, from devm_kasprintf()\ncould be NULL.\nA pointer check is added to prevent potential NULL pointer dereference.\nThis is similar to the fix in commit 3027e7b15b02\n(\"ice: Fix some null pointer dereference issues in ice_ptp.c\").\n\nThis issue is found by our static analysis tool.", "id": "GHSA-495q-r22g-59m9", "modified": "2025-07-25T15:30:51Z", "published": "2025-07-25T15:30:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a10c8bff454b11ef553d9df19ee722d2df34cd0e" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a8d1b4f219e8833130927f19d1c8bfbf49215ce4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a99b598d836c9c6411110c70a2da134c78d96e67" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d27ee5c59881a64ea92e363502742cb4f38b7460" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…