ghsa-4r9m-gmj4-v54c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:35
Modified
2022-05-02 03:35
Details

Multiple integer overflows in memcached 1.1.12 and 1.2.2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving length attributes that trigger heap-based buffer overflows.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2415"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-08-10T18:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple integer overflows in memcached 1.1.12 and 1.2.2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving length attributes that trigger heap-based buffer overflows.",
  "id": "GHSA-4r9m-gmj4-v54c",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:35:02Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:35:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2415"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-December/msg00836.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/56906"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36133"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37729"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/memcached/memcached_1.1.12-1+etch1.diff.gz"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/memcached/memcached_1.2.2-1+lenny1.diff.gz"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1853"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35989"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.