ghsa-4rmp-xhjh-jrfr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:28
Modified
2022-05-13 01:28
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in the getword function in options.c in pppd in Paul's PPP Package (ppp) before 2.4.7 allows attackers to "access privileged options" via a long word in an options file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow that "[corrupts] security-relevant variables."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-3158" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-11-15T21:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in the getword function in options.c in pppd in Paul\u0027s PPP Package (ppp) before 2.4.7 allows attackers to \"access privileged options\" via a long word in an options file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow that \"[corrupts] security-relevant variables.\"", "id": "GHSA-4rmp-xhjh-jrfr", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:28:14Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:28:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3158" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/paulusmack/ppp/commit/7658e8257183f062dc01f87969c140707c7e52cb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128748" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0368.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136932.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=linux-ppp\u0026m=140764978420764" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3079" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:135" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2015-2511959.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2429-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…