ghsa-4vfw-gvwq-xw7v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-16 15:34
Modified
2025-04-16 15:34
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value

The verifier test calls: div by 0 in subprog triggers a panic at the ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values). But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values") we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch). For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5 register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0 to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-22048"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:15:58Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nLoongArch: BPF: Don\u0027t override subprog\u0027s return value\n\nThe verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the\nld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory\naddress returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct\naddress at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values).\nBut at commit 73c359d1d356 (\"LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values\")\nwe also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch).\nFor function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5\nregister. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls\nwhich expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0\nto a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).",
  "id": "GHSA-4vfw-gvwq-xw7v",
  "modified": "2025-04-16T15:34:40Z",
  "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22048"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/223d565d8892481684091cfbaf3466f2b0e289d3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60f3caff1492e5b8616b9578c4bedb5c0a88ed14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/780628a780b622759d9e5adc76d15432144da1a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7df2696256a034405d3c5a71b3a4c54725de4404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/996e90ab446641553e8e21707b38b9709605e0e0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…