ghsa-565j-mpfh-22p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:36
Modified
2022-05-17 01:36
Details

Double free vulnerability in inspect-fs.c in LibguestFS 1.20.x before 1.20.7, 1.21.x, 1.22.0, and 1.23.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via empty guest files.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2013-2124"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-05-27T14:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Double free vulnerability in inspect-fs.c in LibguestFS 1.20.x before 1.20.7, 1.21.x, 1.22.0, and 1.23.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via empty guest files.",
  "id": "GHSA-565j-mpfh-22p5",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:36:20Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:36:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-2124"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/commit/fa6a76050d82894365dfe32916903ef7fee3ffcd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/85145"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-May/msg00079.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-May/msg00080.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/93724"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q2/431"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/60205"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…