ghsa-5g7c-7whj-r862
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:14
Modified
2022-05-03 03:14
Details

fetchmail before 6.3.1 and before 6.2.5.5, when configured for multidrop mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by sending messages without headers from upstream mail servers.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-4348"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-12-21T00:03:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "fetchmail before 6.3.1 and before 6.2.5.5, when configured for multidrop mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) by sending messages without headers from upstream mail servers.",
  "id": "GHSA-5g7c-7whj-r862",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:14:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:14:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4348"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/23713"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A9659"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/233-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343836"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://fetchmail.berlios.de/fetchmail-SA-2005-03.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18172"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18231"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18266"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18433"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18463"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18895"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21253"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24007"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24284"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015383"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security\u0026y=2006\u0026m=slackware-security.443499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-939"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2007_4_sr.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/21906"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2007-0018.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420098/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/435197/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15987"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19289"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.trustix.org/errata/2006/0002"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2996"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3101"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://wwwnew.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:236"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…