ghsa-5hh8-598f-9j69
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:20
Modified
2022-04-30 18:20
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.0 in Microsoft Windows 2000 and RDP 5.1 in Windows XP does not encrypt the checksums of plaintext session data, which could allow a remote attacker to determine the contents of encrypted sessions via sniffing, aka "Weak Encryption in RDP Protocol."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2002-0863" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-11T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Remote Data Protocol (RDP) version 5.0 in Microsoft Windows 2000 and RDP 5.1 in Windows XP does not encrypt the checksums of plaintext session data, which could allow a remote attacker to determine the contents of encrypted sessions via sniffing, aka \"Weak Encryption in RDP Protocol.\"", "id": "GHSA-5hh8-598f-9j69", "modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z", "published": "2022-04-30T18:20:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0863" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2002/ms02-051" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A199" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103235960119404\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=103236181522253\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10121.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10122.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/865833" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5711" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5712" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…