ghsa-5v3f-73gv-x7x5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2017-11-15 20:41
Modified
2023-08-28 10:13
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Summary
cairo is vulnerable to denial of service due to a null pointer dereference
Details
Cairo version 1.15.4 is vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference related to the FT_Load_Glyph
and FT_Render_Glyph
resulting in an application crash.
{ "affected": [ { "package": { "ecosystem": "RubyGems", "name": "cairo" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "1.15.4" }, { "fixed": "1.15.5" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ], "versions": [ "1.15.4" ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-7475" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:17:22Z", "nvd_published_at": "2017-05-19T20:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Cairo version 1.15.4 is vulnerable to a NULL pointer dereference related to the `FT_Load_Glyph` and `FT_Render_Glyph` resulting in an application crash.", "id": "GHSA-5v3f-73gv-x7x5", "modified": "2023-08-28T10:13:34Z", "published": "2017-11-15T20:41:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7475" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100763" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-7475" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/rcairo/rcairo" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/cairo/CVE-2017-7475.yml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772@%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/151" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "cairo is vulnerable to denial of service due to a null pointer dereference" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…