ghsa-5v6r-j86q-gwmh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-27 03:34
Modified
2025-03-05 21:32
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: ctucanfd: handle skb allocation failure
If skb allocation fails, the pointer to struct can_frame is NULL. This is actually handled everywhere inside ctucan_err_interrupt() except for the only place.
Add the missed NULL check.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static analysis tool.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-21775" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T03:15:18Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncan: ctucanfd: handle skb allocation failure\n\nIf skb allocation fails, the pointer to struct can_frame is NULL. This\nis actually handled everywhere inside ctucan_err_interrupt() except for\nthe only place.\n\nAdd the missed NULL check.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE static\nanalysis tool.", "id": "GHSA-5v6r-j86q-gwmh", "modified": "2025-03-05T21:32:07Z", "published": "2025-02-27T03:34:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21775" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84b9ac59978a6a4e0812d1c938fad97306272cef" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bd24927e3eeb85642c7baa3b28be8bea6c2a078" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b0e592dd46a0a952b41c3bf6c963afdd6a42b526" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e505b83b9ee6aa0ae2f4395f573a66579ae403fb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e7e2e2318b1f085044126ba553a4e619842fc36d" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…