ghsa-62qf-qm3g-fvcw
Vulnerability from github
2.3 (Low) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Apache Airflow Providers FAB.
This issue affects Apache Airflow Providers FAB: 1.2.1 (when used with Apache Airflow 2.9.3) and FAB 1.2.0 for all Airflow versions. The FAB provider prevented the user from logging out.
-
FAB provider 1.2.1 only affected Airflow 2.9.3 (earlier and later versions of Airflow are not affected)
-
FAB provider 1.2.0 affected all versions of Airflow.
Users who run Apache Airflow 2.9.3 are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow Providers FAB version 1.2.2 which fixes the issue.
Users who run Any Apache Airflow version and have FAB provider 1.2.0 are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow Providers FAB version 1.2.2 which fixes the issue.
Also upgrading Apache Airflow to latest version available is recommended.
Note: Early version of Airflow reference container images of Airflow 2.9.3 and constraint files contained FAB provider 1.2.1 version, but this is fixed in updated versions of the images.
Users are advised to pull the latest Airflow images or reinstall FAB provider according to the current constraints.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "apache-airflow-providers-fab"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42447"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-613"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-08-05T16:09:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-05T08:15:56Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability in Apache Airflow Providers FAB.\n\nThis issue affects Apache Airflow Providers FAB: 1.2.1 (when used with Apache Airflow 2.9.3) and FAB 1.2.0 for all Airflow versions. The FAB provider prevented the user from logging out.\u00a0\u00a0\n\n* FAB provider 1.2.1 only affected Airflow 2.9.3 (earlier and later versions of Airflow are not affected)\n\n* FAB provider 1.2.0 affected all versions of Airflow.\n\nUsers who run Apache Airflow 2.9.3 are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow Providers FAB version 1.2.2 which fixes the issue.\n\nUsers who run Any Apache Airflow version and have FAB provider 1.2.0 are recommended to upgrade to Apache Airflow Providers FAB version 1.2.2 which fixes the issue.\n\nAlso upgrading Apache Airflow to latest version available is recommended.\n\nNote: Early version of Airflow reference container images of Airflow 2.9.3 and constraint files contained FAB provider 1.2.1 version, but this is fixed in updated versions of the images.\u00a0\n\nUsers are advised to pull the latest Airflow images or reinstall FAB provider according to the current constraints.",
"id": "GHSA-62qf-qm3g-fvcw",
"modified": "2025-03-19T15:43:31Z",
"published": "2024-08-05T09:30:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/40784"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/2zoo8cjlwfjhbfdxfgltcm0hnc0qmc52"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/04/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Airflow Providers FAB Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.