ghsa-6c74-8p8j-4qv8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-16 15:34
Modified
2025-04-16 15:34
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exfat: fix missing shutdown check
xfstests generic/730 test failed because after deleting the device that still had dirty data, the file could still be read without returning an error. The reason is the missing shutdown check in ->read_iter.
I also noticed that shutdown checks were missing from ->write_iter, ->splice_read, and ->mmap. This commit adds shutdown checks to all of them.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-22076" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:16:01Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nexfat: fix missing shutdown check\n\nxfstests generic/730 test failed because after deleting the device\nthat still had dirty data, the file could still be read without\nreturning an error. The reason is the missing shutdown check in\n-\u003eread_iter.\n\nI also noticed that shutdown checks were missing from -\u003ewrite_iter,\n-\u003esplice_read, and -\u003emmap. This commit adds shutdown checks to all\nof them.", "id": "GHSA-6c74-8p8j-4qv8", "modified": "2025-04-16T15:34:43Z", "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:42Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22076" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47e35366bc6fa3cf189a8305bce63992495f3efa" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a9595eb024b8319957c178be3cdeed613ac0795" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/539147585ca453db6e3d7a5cf3b9c9690513762d" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e41e33eb795cb9c1ead6ac627d8710546fac6e81" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…