ghsa-743f-m6p2-83h6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-01-21 15:31
Modified
2025-05-22 15:34
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

riscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address

In sparse vmemmap model, the virtual address of vmemmap is calculated as: ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT)). And the struct page's va can be calculated with an offset: (vmemmap + (pfn)).

However, when initializing struct pages, kernel actually starts from the first page from the same section that phys_ram_base belongs to. If the first page's physical address is not (phys_ram_base >> PAGE_SHIFT), then we get an va below VMEMMAP_START when calculating va for it's struct page.

For example, if phys_ram_base starts from 0x82000000 with pfn 0x82000, the first page in the same section is actually pfn 0x80000. During init_unavailable_range(), we will initialize struct page for pfn 0x80000 with virtual address ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - 0x2000), which is below VMEMMAP_START as well as PCI_IO_END.

This commit fixes this bug by introducing a new variable 'vmemmap_start_pfn' which is aligned with memory section size and using it to calculate vmemmap address instead of phys_ram_base.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-57945"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-21T13:15:09Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nriscv: mm: Fix the out of bound issue of vmemmap address\n\nIn sparse vmemmap model, the virtual address of vmemmap is calculated as:\n((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - (phys_ram_base \u003e\u003e PAGE_SHIFT)).\nAnd the struct page\u0027s va can be calculated with an offset:\n(vmemmap + (pfn)).\n\nHowever, when initializing struct pages, kernel actually starts from the\nfirst page from the same section that phys_ram_base belongs to. If the\nfirst page\u0027s physical address is not (phys_ram_base \u003e\u003e PAGE_SHIFT), then\nwe get an va below VMEMMAP_START when calculating va for it\u0027s struct page.\n\nFor example, if phys_ram_base starts from 0x82000000 with pfn 0x82000, the\nfirst page in the same section is actually pfn 0x80000. During\ninit_unavailable_range(), we will initialize struct page for pfn 0x80000\nwith virtual address ((struct page *)VMEMMAP_START - 0x2000), which is\nbelow VMEMMAP_START as well as PCI_IO_END.\n\nThis commit fixes this bug by introducing a new variable\n\u0027vmemmap_start_pfn\u0027 which is aligned with memory section size and using\nit to calculate vmemmap address instead of phys_ram_base.",
  "id": "GHSA-743f-m6p2-83h6",
  "modified": "2025-05-22T15:34:46Z",
  "published": "2025-01-21T15:31:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57945"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92f08673d3f1893191323572f60e3c62f2e57c2f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4a7ac3d266008018f05fae53060fcb331151a14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2bd51954ac8377c2f1eb1813e694788998add66"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f754f27e98f88428aaf6be6e00f5cbce97f62d4b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…