ghsa-76wc-mqwv-wjv2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:10
Modified
2022-05-01 18:10
VLAI Severity ?
Details
sudo, when linked with MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5), does not properly check whether a user can currently authenticate to Kerberos, which allows local users to gain privileges, in a manner unintended by the sudo security model, via certain KRB5_ environment variable settings. NOTE: another researcher disputes this vulnerability, stating that the attacker must be "a user, who can already log into your system, and can already use sudo."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-3149" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-06-11T18:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "sudo, when linked with MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5), does not properly check whether a user can currently authenticate to Kerberos, which allows local users to gain privileges, in a manner unintended by the sudo security model, via certain KRB5_ environment variable settings. NOTE: another researcher disputes this vulnerability, stating that the attacker must be \"a user, who can already log into your system, and can already use sudo.\"", "id": "GHSA-76wc-mqwv-wjv2", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:10:49Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:10:49Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-3149" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26540" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/470739/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/470752/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/470774/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24368" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.sudo.ws/cgi-bin/cvsweb/sudo/auth/kerb5.c" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…