ghsa-77f9-3fqp-c88c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:27
Modified
2022-05-13 01:27
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The Bitcoin protocol, as used in bitcoind before 0.4.4, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, and other programs, does not properly handle multiple transactions with the same identifier, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unspendable transaction) by leveraging the ability to create a duplicate coinbase transaction.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2012-1909" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-06T16:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The Bitcoin protocol, as used in bitcoind before 0.4.4, wxBitcoin, Bitcoin-Qt, and other programs, does not properly handle multiple transactions with the same identifier, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unspendable transaction) by leveraging the ability to create a duplicate coinbase transaction.", "id": "GHSA-77f9-3fqp-c88c", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:27:55Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:27:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1909" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/commit/a206b0ea12eb4606b93323268fc81a4f1f952531" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=67738.0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407793" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0030" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVEs" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://r6.ca/blog/20120206T005236Z.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAPg%2BsBhmGHnMResVxPDZdfpmWTb9uqD0RrQD7oSXBQq7oHpm8g%40mail.gmail.com\u0026forum_name=bitcoin-development" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…