ghsa-7gr4-mrjx-cjx9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:29
Modified
2022-05-14 03:29
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The int_x509_param_set_hosts function in lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vpm.c in LibreSSL 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 does not support a certain special case of a zero name length, which causes silent omission of hostname verification, and consequently allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. NOTE: the LibreSSL documentation indicates that this special case is supported, but the BoringSSL documentation does not.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-8970" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-03-24T21:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The int_x509_param_set_hosts function in lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vpm.c in LibreSSL 2.7.0 before 2.7.1 does not support a certain special case of a zero name length, which causes silent omission of hostname verification, and consequently allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. NOTE: the LibreSSL documentation indicates that this special case is supported, but the BoringSSL documentation does not.", "id": "GHSA-7gr4-mrjx-cjx9", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:29:32Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:29:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-8970" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/libressl-portable/openbsd/commit/0654414afcce51a16d35d05060190a3ec4618d42" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/e759a9cd84198613199259dbed401f4951747cff" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-2.7.1-relnotes.txt" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…