ghsa-7qmq-v2mf-j6r3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:07
Modified
2025-04-20 03:37
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The C client and C-based client bindings in the Apache Qpid Proton library before 0.13.1 on Windows do not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate when using the SChannel-based security layer, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-4467" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-295" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-05-02T14:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The C client and C-based client bindings in the Apache Qpid Proton library before 0.13.1 on Windows do not properly verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject\u0027s Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate when using the SChannel-based security layer, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.", "id": "GHSA-7qmq-v2mf-j6r3", "modified": "2025-04-20T03:37:08Z", "published": "2022-05-14T01:07:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4467" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/914424e4d798a340f523b6169aaf39b626971d9bb00fcdeb1d5d6c0d%40%3Ccommits.qpid.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/914424e4d798a340f523b6169aaf39b626971d9bb00fcdeb1d5d6c0d@%3Ccommits.qpid.apache.org%3E" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/15/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91788" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036316" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…