ghsa-7vfx-9973-f38h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-05-01 15:31
Modified
2025-05-01 15:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/dpu: Fix error pointers in dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check
The function dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check was dereferencing pointers returned by drm_atomic_get_plane_state without checking for errors. This could lead to undefined behavior if the function returns an error pointer.
This commit adds checks using IS_ERR to ensure that plane_state is valid before dereferencing them.
Similar to commit da29abe71e16 ("drm/amd/display: Fix error pointers in amdgpu_dm_crtc_mem_type_changed").
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/643132/
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-37783" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-05-01T14:15:42Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/msm/dpu: Fix error pointers in dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check\n\nThe function dpu_plane_virtual_atomic_check was dereferencing pointers\nreturned by drm_atomic_get_plane_state without checking for errors. This\ncould lead to undefined behavior if the function returns an error pointer.\n\nThis commit adds checks using IS_ERR to ensure that plane_state is\nvalid before dereferencing them.\n\nSimilar to commit da29abe71e16\n(\"drm/amd/display: Fix error pointers in amdgpu_dm_crtc_mem_type_changed\").\n\nPatchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/643132/", "id": "GHSA-7vfx-9973-f38h", "modified": "2025-05-01T15:31:45Z", "published": "2025-05-01T15:31:44Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-37783" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5cb1b130e1cd04239cc9c26a98279f4660dce583" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a9670ed1cce3216778c89936d3ae91cf0d436035" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…