ghsa-8226-xx72-qrh6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:28
Modified
2022-05-17 01:28
Details

The Expressway component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) uses the same default X.509 certificate across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL sessions by leveraging the certificate's trust relationship, aka Bug ID CSCue07471.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-0675"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-01-23T04:41:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The Expressway component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) uses the same default X.509 certificate across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL sessions by leveraging the certificate\u0027s trust relationship, aka Bug ID CSCue07471.",
  "id": "GHSA-8226-xx72-qrh6",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:28:30Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:28:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0675"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90650"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/102377"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/56621"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2014-0675"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=32540"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65101"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029682"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…