github - ghsa-83jq-p4c9-7938

ghsa-83jq-p4c9-7938

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-04-30 18:22

Modified

2022-04-30 18:22

Details

Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the 'DominoNoBanner=1' option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-2191"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the \u0027DominoNoBanner=1\u0027 option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner.",
  "id": "GHSA-83jq-p4c9-7938",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:22:41Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:22:41Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-2191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10557.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/298874/2002-11-05/2002-11-11/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6128"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

CVE-2002-2191 (GCVE-0-2002-2191)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2005-11-16 21:17

Modified

2024-09-16 19:36

Severity ?

CWE

n/a

Summary

Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the 'DominoNoBanner=1' option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner.

References

►

URL

Tags

	http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/298874/2002-11-05/2002-11-11/2	mailing-list, x_refsource_BUGTRAQ
	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6128	vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
	http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10557.php	vdb-entry, x_refsource_XF

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	n/a	n/a	Version: n/a

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-08T03:51:17.611Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "20021107 Lotus Domino HTTP Server security issue",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/298874/2002-11-05/2002-11-11/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "6128",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6128"
          },
          {
            "name": "lotus-domino-version-disclosure(10557)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10557.php"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the \u0027DominoNoBanner=1\u0027 option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2005-11-16T21:17:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "20021107 Lotus Domino HTTP Server security issue",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/298874/2002-11-05/2002-11-11/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "6128",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6128"
        },
        {
          "name": "lotus-domino-version-disclosure(10557)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10557.php"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2002-2191",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Lotus Domino 5.0.9a and earlier, even when configured with the \u0027DominoNoBanner=1\u0027 option, allows remote attackers to obtain potential sensitive information such as the version via a request for a non-existent .nsf database, which leaks the version in the HTTP banner."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "20021107 Lotus Domino HTTP Server security issue",
              "refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/298874/2002-11-05/2002-11-11/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "6128",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/6128"
            },
            {
              "name": "lotus-domino-version-disclosure(10557)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10557.php"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2002-2191",
    "datePublished": "2005-11-16T21:17:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2005-11-16T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T19:36:48.402Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.