ghsa-86f4-ffm7-3hcc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-06-18 12:30
Modified
2025-06-18 12:30
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init
Every iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node() decrements the reference count of the previous node. When breaking early from a for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, we need to explicitly call of_node_put() on the child node. Add missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2022-50121" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-06-18T11:15:41Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nremoteproc: k3-r5: Fix refcount leak in k3_r5_cluster_of_init\n\nEvery iteration of for_each_available_child_of_node() decrements\nthe reference count of the previous node.\nWhen breaking early from a for_each_available_child_of_node() loop,\nwe need to explicitly call of_node_put() on the child node.\nAdd missing of_node_put() to avoid refcount leak.", "id": "GHSA-86f4-ffm7-3hcc", "modified": "2025-06-18T12:30:49Z", "published": "2025-06-18T12:30:49Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50121" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f83c4cf1b78331c23876977aa7b9151aff2f9e1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61cd8cd3b6b33c7eae3b45cf783b114f2ae53528" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/75358732af9b26acfe3e609943290bcba13330fc" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf112a52d758092ca3d5ebdad51dd17bda5ba3e5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa220c05d282e7479abe08b54e3bdffd06c25e97" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…