ghsa-9rch-5m7j-5mjm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:43
Modified
2025-04-11 04:01
Details

The python SDK before 3.1.0.6 and CLI before 3.1.0.8 for oVirt 3.1 does not check the server SSL certificate against the client keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof a server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-3533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-08-31T20:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The python SDK before 3.1.0.6 and CLI before 3.1.0.8 for oVirt 3.1 does not check the server SSL certificate against the client keys, which allows remote attackers to spoof a server via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.",
  "id": "GHSA-9rch-5m7j-5mjm",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T04:01:45Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:43:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851672"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/77984"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7209"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/7249"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/24/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/26/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55208"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…