ghsa-c625-ghm3-xfc2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:12
Modified
2022-05-14 02:12
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roundcube Webmail before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that download attachments and cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via unspecified vectors.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-4069" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-08-25T18:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roundcube Webmail before 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that download attachments and cause a denial of service (disk consumption) via unspecified vectors.", "id": "GHSA-c625-ghm3-xfc2", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:12:12Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:12:12Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-4069" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/issues/4957" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/4a408843b0ef816daf70a472a02b78cd6073a4d5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/699af1e5206ed9114322adaa3c25c1c969640a53" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.1.5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/wiki/Changelog#release-115" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00079.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/04/23/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92654" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…