ghsa-cf23-xh47-rxhj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-27 03:34
Modified
2025-02-27 03:34
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

NFS: Fix potential buffer overflowin nfs_sysfs_link_rpc_client()

name is char[64] where the size of clnt->cl_program->name remains unknown. Invoking strcat() directly will also lead to potential buffer overflow. Change them to strscpy() and strncat() to fix potential issues.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-54456"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T03:15:10Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nNFS: Fix potential buffer overflowin nfs_sysfs_link_rpc_client()\n\nname is char[64] where the size of clnt-\u003ecl_program-\u003ename remains\nunknown. Invoking strcat() directly will also lead to potential buffer\noverflow. Change them to strscpy() and strncat() to fix potential\nissues.",
  "id": "GHSA-cf23-xh47-rxhj",
  "modified": "2025-02-27T03:34:02Z",
  "published": "2025-02-27T03:34:02Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-54456"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19b3ca651b4b473878c73539febe477905041442"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49fd4e34751e90e6df009b70cd0659dc839e7ca8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd8830779b77f4d1206d28d02ad56a03fc0e78f7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8e0eb5601d4a6c74c336e3710afe3a0348c469d"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…