ghsa-cfvr-4cm5-x2r3
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nvme-multipath: fix suspicious RCU usage warning
When I run the NVME over TCP test in virtme-ng, I get the following "suspicious RCU usage" warning in nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link():
''' [ 5.024557][ T44] nvmet: Created nvm controller 1 for subsystem nqn.2025-06.org.nvmexpress.mptcp for NQN nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:f7f6b5e0-ff97-4894-98ac-c85309e0bc77. [ 5.027401][ T183] nvme nvme0: creating 2 I/O queues. [ 5.029017][ T183] nvme nvme0: mapped 2/0/0 default/read/poll queues. [ 5.032587][ T183] nvme nvme0: new ctrl: NQN "nqn.2025-06.org.nvmexpress.mptcp", addr 127.0.0.1:4420, hostnqn: nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:f7f6b5e0-ff97-4894-98ac-c85309e0bc77 [ 5.042214][ T25] [ 5.042440][ T25] ============================= [ 5.042579][ T25] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5.042705][ T25] 6.16.0-rc3+ #23 Not tainted [ 5.042812][ T25] ----------------------------- [ 5.042934][ T25] drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c:1203 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! [ 5.043111][ T25] [ 5.043111][ T25] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.043111][ T25] [ 5.043341][ T25] [ 5.043341][ T25] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5.043502][ T25] 3 locks held by kworker/u9:0/25: [ 5.043615][ T25] #0: ffff888008730948 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7ed/0x1350 [ 5.043830][ T25] #1: ffffc900001afd40 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xcf3/0x1350 [ 5.044084][ T25] #2: ffff888013ee0020 (&head->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link.part.0+0xb4/0x3a0 [ 5.044300][ T25] [ 5.044300][ T25] stack backtrace: [ 5.044439][ T25] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 25 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc3+ #23 PREEMPT(full) [ 5.044441][ T25] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 5.044442][ T25] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn [ 5.044445][ T25] Call Trace: [ 5.044446][ T25] [ 5.044449][ T25] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0 [ 5.044453][ T25] lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xb1 [ 5.044457][ T25] nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link.part.0+0x2fb/0x3a0 [ 5.044459][ T25] ? queue_work_on+0x90/0xf0 [ 5.044461][ T25] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x110 [ 5.044466][ T25] nvme_mpath_set_live+0x1e9/0x4f0 [ 5.044470][ T25] nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x240/0x2f0 [ 5.044472][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044475][ T25] ? add_disk_fwnode+0x361/0x580 [ 5.044480][ T25] nvme_alloc_ns+0x81c/0x17c0 [ 5.044483][ T25] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0x104/0x240 [ 5.044487][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_alloc_ns+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044495][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_find_get_ns+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044496][ T25] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x45/0xa0 [ 5.044498][ T25] ? validate_chain+0x232/0x4f0 [ 5.044503][ T25] nvme_scan_ns+0x4c8/0x810 [ 5.044506][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_scan_ns+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044508][ T25] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 5.044512][ T25] ? ktime_get+0x16d/0x220 [ 5.044517][ T25] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x18/0x30 [ 5.044520][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_scan_ns_async+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044522][ T25] async_run_entry_fn+0x97/0x560 [ 5.044523][ T25] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0 [ 5.044526][ T25] process_one_work+0xd3c/0x1350 [ 5.044532][ T25] ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044536][ T25] ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240 [ 5.044539][ T25] worker_thread+0x4da/0xd50 [ 5.044545][ T25] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044546][ T25] kthread+0x356/0x5c0 [ 5.044548][ T25] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 5.044549][ T25] ? ret_from_fork+0x1b/0x2e0 [ 5.044552][ T25] ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x5d/0x180 [ 5.044553][ T25] ? ret_from_fork+0x1b/0x2e0 [ 5.044555][ T25] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0 [ 5.044557][ T25] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 5.04 ---truncated---
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-38397" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-25T13:15:29Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnvme-multipath: fix suspicious RCU usage warning\n\nWhen I run the NVME over TCP test in virtme-ng, I get the following\n\"suspicious RCU usage\" warning in nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link():\n\n\u0027\u0027\u0027\n[ 5.024557][ T44] nvmet: Created nvm controller 1 for subsystem nqn.2025-06.org.nvmexpress.mptcp for NQN nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:f7f6b5e0-ff97-4894-98ac-c85309e0bc77.\n[ 5.027401][ T183] nvme nvme0: creating 2 I/O queues.\n[ 5.029017][ T183] nvme nvme0: mapped 2/0/0 default/read/poll queues.\n[ 5.032587][ T183] nvme nvme0: new ctrl: NQN \"nqn.2025-06.org.nvmexpress.mptcp\", addr 127.0.0.1:4420, hostnqn: nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:f7f6b5e0-ff97-4894-98ac-c85309e0bc77\n[ 5.042214][ T25]\n[ 5.042440][ T25] =============================\n[ 5.042579][ T25] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n[ 5.042705][ T25] 6.16.0-rc3+ #23 Not tainted\n[ 5.042812][ T25] -----------------------------\n[ 5.042934][ T25] drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c:1203 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n[ 5.043111][ T25]\n[ 5.043111][ T25] other info that might help us debug this:\n[ 5.043111][ T25]\n[ 5.043341][ T25]\n[ 5.043341][ T25] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n[ 5.043502][ T25] 3 locks held by kworker/u9:0/25:\n[ 5.043615][ T25] #0: ffff888008730948 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7ed/0x1350\n[ 5.043830][ T25] #1: ffffc900001afd40 ((work_completion)(\u0026entry-\u003ework)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xcf3/0x1350\n[ 5.044084][ T25] #2: ffff888013ee0020 (\u0026head-\u003esrcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link.part.0+0xb4/0x3a0\n[ 5.044300][ T25]\n[ 5.044300][ T25] stack backtrace:\n[ 5.044439][ T25] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 25 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Not tainted 6.16.0-rc3+ #23 PREEMPT(full)\n[ 5.044441][ T25] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011\n[ 5.044442][ T25] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn\n[ 5.044445][ T25] Call Trace:\n[ 5.044446][ T25] \u003cTASK\u003e\n[ 5.044449][ T25] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0\n[ 5.044453][ T25] lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xb1\n[ 5.044457][ T25] nvme_mpath_add_sysfs_link.part.0+0x2fb/0x3a0\n[ 5.044459][ T25] ? queue_work_on+0x90/0xf0\n[ 5.044461][ T25] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x110\n[ 5.044466][ T25] nvme_mpath_set_live+0x1e9/0x4f0\n[ 5.044470][ T25] nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x240/0x2f0\n[ 5.044472][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_mpath_add_disk+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044475][ T25] ? add_disk_fwnode+0x361/0x580\n[ 5.044480][ T25] nvme_alloc_ns+0x81c/0x17c0\n[ 5.044483][ T25] ? kasan_quarantine_put+0x104/0x240\n[ 5.044487][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_alloc_ns+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044495][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_find_get_ns+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044496][ T25] ? rcu_read_lock_any_held+0x45/0xa0\n[ 5.044498][ T25] ? validate_chain+0x232/0x4f0\n[ 5.044503][ T25] nvme_scan_ns+0x4c8/0x810\n[ 5.044506][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_scan_ns+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044508][ T25] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80\n[ 5.044512][ T25] ? ktime_get+0x16d/0x220\n[ 5.044517][ T25] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x18/0x30\n[ 5.044520][ T25] ? __pfx_nvme_scan_ns_async+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044522][ T25] async_run_entry_fn+0x97/0x560\n[ 5.044523][ T25] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0\n[ 5.044526][ T25] process_one_work+0xd3c/0x1350\n[ 5.044532][ T25] ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044536][ T25] ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240\n[ 5.044539][ T25] worker_thread+0x4da/0xd50\n[ 5.044545][ T25] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044546][ T25] kthread+0x356/0x5c0\n[ 5.044548][ T25] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.044549][ T25] ? ret_from_fork+0x1b/0x2e0\n[ 5.044552][ T25] ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x5d/0x180\n[ 5.044553][ T25] ? ret_from_fork+0x1b/0x2e0\n[ 5.044555][ T25] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xc0\n[ 5.044557][ T25] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10\n[ 5.04\n---truncated---", "id": "GHSA-cfvr-4cm5-x2r3", "modified": "2025-07-25T15:30:52Z", "published": "2025-07-25T15:30:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38397" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a432383e6cd86d9fda00a6073ed35c1067a836d6" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6811074203b13f715ce2480ac64c5b1c773f2a5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.