ghsa-cpgp-qq89-2x6x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:44
Modified
2025-04-12 12:49
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The Utf8DecoderBase::WriteUtf16Slow function in unicode-decoder.cc in Google V8, as used in Node.js before 0.12.6, io.js before 1.8.3 and 2.x before 2.3.3, and other products, does not verify that there is memory available for a UTF-16 surrogate pair, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted byte sequence.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-5380" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-07-09T10:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The Utf8DecoderBase::WriteUtf16Slow function in unicode-decoder.cc in Google V8, as used in Node.js before 0.12.6, io.js before 1.8.3 and 2.x before 2.3.3, and other products, does not verify that there is memory available for a UTF-16 surrogate pair, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted byte sequence.", "id": "GHSA-cpgp-qq89-2x6x", "modified": "2025-04-12T12:49:34Z", "published": "2022-05-17T03:44:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5380" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/25583" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://codereview.chromium.org/1226493003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://medium.com/%40iojs/important-security-upgrades-for-node-js-and-io-js-8ac14ece5852" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://medium.com/@iojs/important-security-upgrades-for-node-js-and-io-js-8ac14ece5852" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blog.nodejs.org/2015/07/03/node-v0-12-6-stable" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75556" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…