ghsa-cq23-cxpr-f49x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-21 01:50
Modified
2022-04-21 01:50
VLAI Severity ?
Details
It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-3280" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-338" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2021-05-21T20:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "It was found that various OpenID Providers (OPs) had TLS Server Certificates that used weak keys, as a result of the Debian Predictable Random Number Generator (CVE-2008-0166). In combination with the DNS Cache Poisoning issue (CVE-2008-1447) and the fact that almost all SSL/TLS implementations do not consult CRLs (currently an untracked issue), this means that it is impossible to rely on these OPs.", "id": "GHSA-cq23-cxpr-f49x", "modified": "2022-04-21T01:50:57Z", "published": "2022-04-21T01:50:57Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3280" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/5720" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-security/2008-August/000942.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…