ghsa-cqrh-v7qh-v682
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:54
Modified
2022-05-17 04:54
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Allegro RomPager before 4.51, as used on the ZyXEL P660HW-D1, Huawei MT882, Sitecom WL-174, TP-LINK TD-8816, and D-Link DSL-2640R and DSL-2641R, when the "forbidden author header" protection mechanism is bypassed, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by requesting a nonexistent URI in conjunction with a crafted HTTP Referer header that is not properly handled in a 404 page. NOTE: there is no CVE for a "URL redirection" issue that some sources list separately.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-6786" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-79" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-01-16T19:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Allegro RomPager before 4.51, as used on the ZyXEL P660HW-D1, Huawei MT882, Sitecom WL-174, TP-LINK TD-8816, and D-Link DSL-2640R and DSL-2641R, when the \"forbidden author header\" protection mechanism is bypassed, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML by requesting a nonexistent URI in conjunction with a crafted HTTP Referer header that is not properly handled in a 404 page. NOTE: there is no CVE for a \"URL redirection\" issue that some sources list separately.", "id": "GHSA-cqrh-v7qh-v682", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:54:16Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:54:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-6786" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://antoniovazquezblanco.github.io/docs/advisories/Advisory_RomPagerXSS.pdf" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/99694" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/ref/99/rompager407.pdf" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…