ghsa-cxcw-75qj-r943
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-04-16 15:34
Modified
2025-04-16 15:34
VLAI Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: add check read-only before txBeginAnon() call
Added a read-only check before calling txBeginAnon
in extAlloc
and extRecord
. This prevents modification attempts on a read-only
mounted filesystem, avoiding potential errors or crashes.
Call trace: txBeginAnon+0xac/0x154 extAlloc+0xe8/0xdec fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c:78 jfs_get_block+0x340/0xb98 fs/jfs/inode.c:248 __block_write_begin_int+0x580/0x166c fs/buffer.c:2128 __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2177 [inline] block_write_begin+0x98/0x11c fs/buffer.c:2236 jfs_write_begin+0x44/0x88 fs/jfs/inode.c:299
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-58095" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-16T15:15:53Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\njfs: add check read-only before txBeginAnon() call\n\nAdded a read-only check before calling `txBeginAnon` in `extAlloc`\nand `extRecord`. This prevents modification attempts on a read-only\nmounted filesystem, avoiding potential errors or crashes.\n\nCall trace:\n txBeginAnon+0xac/0x154\n extAlloc+0xe8/0xdec fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c:78\n jfs_get_block+0x340/0xb98 fs/jfs/inode.c:248\n __block_write_begin_int+0x580/0x166c fs/buffer.c:2128\n __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2177 [inline]\n block_write_begin+0x98/0x11c fs/buffer.c:2236\n jfs_write_begin+0x44/0x88 fs/jfs/inode.c:299", "id": "GHSA-cxcw-75qj-r943", "modified": "2025-04-16T15:34:38Z", "published": "2025-04-16T15:34:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-58095" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0176e69743ecc02961f2ae1ea42439cd2bf9ed58" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15469c408af2d7a52fb186a92f2f091b0f13b1fb" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…