ghsa-f6g8-8p5j-hphv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 07:28
Modified
2025-04-09 03:32
VLAI Severity ?
Details
SSH Tectia Client/Server/Connector 5.1.0 and earlier, Manager 2.2.0 and earlier, and other products, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, removes PKCS-1 padding before generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents Tectia from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS #1, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4339.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2006-5484" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2006-10-24T22:07:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "SSH Tectia Client/Server/Connector 5.1.0 and earlier, Manager 2.2.0 and earlier, and other products, when using an RSA key with exponent 3, removes PKCS-1 padding before generating a hash, which allows remote attackers to forge a PKCS #1 v1.5 signature that is signed by that RSA key and prevents Tectia from correctly verifying X.509 and other certificates that use PKCS #1, a similar issue to CVE-2006-4339.", "id": "GHSA-f6g8-8p5j-hphv", "modified": "2025-04-09T03:32:38Z", "published": "2022-05-01T07:28:51Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-5484" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22350" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017060" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1017061" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/845620" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ssh.com/company/news/2006/english/security/article/786" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/4032" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…