ghsa-ffmh-r67w-m88f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:44
Modified
2024-05-14 20:53
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
OpenStack Nova Denial of service attack on the compute host
Details

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova 15.x through 15.1.0 and 16.x through 16.1.1. By detaching and reattaching an encrypted volume, an attacker may access the underlying raw volume and corrupt the LUKS header, resulting in a denial of service attack on the compute host. (The same code error also results in data loss, but that is not a vulnerability because the user loses their own data.) All Nova setups supporting encrypted volumes are affected.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "nova"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "15.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "15.1.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "nova"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "16.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "16.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-18191"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2024-05-14T20:53:44Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-02-19T17:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An issue was discovered in OpenStack Nova 15.x through 15.1.0 and 16.x through 16.1.1. By detaching and reattaching an encrypted volume, an attacker may access the underlying raw volume and corrupt the LUKS header, resulting in a denial of service attack on the compute host. (The same code error also results in data loss, but that is not a vulnerability because the user loses their own data.) All Nova setups supporting encrypted volumes are affected.",
  "id": "GHSA-ffmh-r67w-m88f",
  "modified": "2024-05-14T20:53:44Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:44:36Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-18191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/0225a61fc4557c1257383a654f0741f7ef2ddeac"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/5b64a1936122eeb35f37a09f9d38159e1a224c58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/cd3eb60c2c00bcccfa9ccd4bf9d1a96ae7a5cd88"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2332"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2714"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2855"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openstack/nova"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://launchpad.net/bugs/1739593"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://review.openstack.org/539893"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2018-001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/04/20/3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103104"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenStack Nova Denial of service attack on the compute host"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.