ghsa-ffqx-92p8-2h7f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:18
Modified
2025-01-16 21:30
Details

** DISPUTED * Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of fragmented UDP packets. NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that it requires high bandwidth to exploit, and the server does not experience any instability. Therefore this "laws of physics" issue might not be included in CVE.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2001-1533"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2001-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "** DISPUTED * Microsoft Internet Security and Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a flood of fragmented UDP packets.  NOTE: the vendor disputes this issue, saying that it requires high bandwidth to exploit, and the server does not experience any instability.  Therefore this \"laws of physics\" issue might not be included in CVE.",
  "id": "GHSA-ffqx-92p8-2h7f",
  "modified": "2025-01-16T21:30:51Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2001-1533"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/11/msg00018.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2001/11/msg00031.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/7446.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3501"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…