ghsa-grgp-hrrx-jxvp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 03:00
Modified
2022-04-29 03:00
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer overflow in ibserver for Firebird Database 1.0 and other versions before 1.5, and possibly other products that use the InterBase codebase, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long database name, as demonstrated using the gsec command.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2004-2043" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2004-05-01T04:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in ibserver for Firebird Database 1.0 and other versions before 1.5, and possibly other products that use the InterBase codebase, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long database name, as demonstrated using the gsec command.", "id": "GHSA-grgp-hrrx-jxvp", "modified": "2022-04-29T03:00:41Z", "published": "2022-04-29T03:00:41Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2043" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16229" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16316" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-06/0027.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108611386202493\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11756" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19350" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1010381" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1014" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/6408" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/6624" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5AP0P0UCUO.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10446" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…