ghsa-h2rx-x3c4-3hrp
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:05
Modified
2025-04-11 03:34
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM Lotus Notes 8.5 and 8.5fp1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown attack vectors, as demonstrated by the vd_ln module in VulnDisco 9.0. NOTE: as of 20100222, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the VulnDisco author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-1608" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-04-29T17:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM Lotus Notes 8.5 and 8.5fp1, and possibly other versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown attack vectors, as demonstrated by the vd_ln module in VulnDisco 9.0. NOTE: as of 20100222, this disclosure has no actionable information. However, because the VulnDisco author is a reliable researcher, the issue is being assigned a CVE identifier for tracking purposes.", "id": "GHSA-h2rx-x3c4-3hrp", "modified": "2025-04-11T03:34:27Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:05:33Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1608" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/58322" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://forum.immunityinc.com/board/thread/1161/vulndisco-9-0" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A14489" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38622" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38300" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…