ghsa-h47f-59w9-ghf7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:18
Modified
2022-04-30 18:18
Details

Buffer overflow in bindsock in Lotus Domino 5.0.4 and 5.0.7 on Linux allows local users to gain root privileges via a long (1) Notes_ExecDirectory or (2) PATH environment variable.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0086"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-03-15T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in bindsock in Lotus Domino 5.0.4 and 5.0.7 on Linux allows local users to gain root privileges via a long (1) Notes_ExecDirectory or (2) PATH environment variable.",
  "id": "GHSA-h47f-59w9-ghf7",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:18:30Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:18:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0086"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/8583"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/8585"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21095569"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21100441"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.esecurityonline.com/advisories/eSO4124.asp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.esecurityonline.com/advisories/eSO4126.asp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4317"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4319"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.


Loading…

Loading…